• Author
• Recent Posts

Follow me

Michael Garcia Mujica

"Currer Bell is neither man nor woman, but an abstract thing, an artist."

• Michael Garcia Mujica, Lead Educator in Arts and Film History.

Echoing the sentiment about Charlotte Brontë's pseudonymous voice, Michael lends his expertise not only as a writer and visual artist but also as a Lead Educator in arts and film history. Based in Coral Gables, Florida, he is the principal of Vintage Brooks, Inc., where he passionately revitalizes the legacy of silent film star Louise Brooks. His acclaimed blog, Naked on My Goat, serves as a living tribute to Brooks's enduring influence in film, her profound writing, and her broad appreciation for the arts.

Just as Brontë made an indelible mark in literature despite the societal constraints of her time, Michael accentuates Brooks's trailblazing spirit within the film industry. In his role, he ensures that Brooks's iconic voice continues to resonate within the cultural lexicon of the 21st century, celebrating the intricate victories of women in the arts, both past and present.

Explore more about the abstract persona of Charlotte Brontë in Michael's piece, "The Abstract Persona: Understanding Charlotte Brontë's Pseudonymous Journey as Currer Bell."

“I am satisfied that if a book is a good one, it is so whatever the sex of the author may be. All novels are or should be written for both men and women to read, and I am at a loss to conceive how a man should permit himself to write anything that would be really disgraceful to a woman, or why a woman should be censured for writing anything that would be proper and becoming for a man.”

• Anne Brontë, The Tenant of Wildfell Hall

Follow me

Latest posts by Michael Garcia Mujica (see all)

• Lost Souls in the City of Dreams: Angelo Badalamenti’s Love Theme and the Fragile Illusions of Mulholland Drive - September 1, 2024
• Exposing the “Debacle” of Thomas Gladysz: A Parallelistic Examination of Obsession and Missteps - August 30, 2024
• The Cult of Personality: Vincent Lesh and Thomas Gladysz - August 28, 2024

In the waning luminescence of Hollywood’s golden era, where the once-bright glamour of the silver screen began to dim, Louise Brooks, known to the world as Lulu, embarked on a transformative odyssey. This nickname, Lulu, akin to the stylized titles Sunset Blvd. and Mulholland Dr., stands as a symbol of the duality and transformation so inherent in the life of an actor. Just as Gloria Swanson’s portrayal of Norma Desmond in Sunset Blvd. and Naomi Watts’s portrayal of Betty Elms/Diane Selwyn in Mulholland Dr. deftly grapple with the intricacies and complexities of their identities, Brooks too navigated the nuanced interstice between Lulu and Louise.

Lulu, once the embodiment of the vibrant, carefree flapper, began to unravel the tightly wound threads of her persona. This iconic image, a construct of celluloid dreams, had once defined her. Yet, in the twilight of her career, Brooks sought solace not in the adoration of fans but in the embrace of her true identity – that of Mary Louise Brooks.

Turning to the introspective realms of art and philosophy, Brooks found resonance in Arthur Schopenhauer’s musings. Schopenhauer, who viewed art as a means to transcend life’s sufferings, became a beacon for her. His philosophy echoed the hollowness of fleeting fame and the depth of existential truth.

In this chapter of her life, Brooks mirrored the essence of Sunset Blvd.’s narrative but with a crucial divergence. Where Norma Desmond tragically clung to a lost era, Brooks embraced the quietude of obscurity. She found beauty not in the sparkling lights of movie premieres but in the hushed galleries of art museums, the quiet corners of libraries, and the reflective solitude of a life lived away from the camera’s intrusive gaze.

This resignation from the Lulu archetype was not a defeat but an evolution. Brooks, in her unapologetic pursuit of authenticity, became an archetype of her own – a symbol of the artist as a seeker of truth, unbound by the superficial trappings of fame. In her twilight years, the flapper’s vivacity gave way to the serenity of a sage, a transformation as profound as it was poignant.

In Twilight of the Flapper, we witness the metamorphosis of Louise Brooks from a cinematic icon to a figure of artistic and philosophical reverence. This story is a testament to the enduring power of self-reinvention and the timeless quest for meaning beyond the glittering facade of fame, reminding us that the journey towards self-discovery is as compelling as any drama played out on the silver screen.

The Real Louise Brooks Society

Emerging from this transformative period, Brooks unknowingly laid the foundation for the true Louise Brooks Society. This society blossomed into a cantabile symphony of correspondence and dulcet interactions, a euphonic ensemble far removed from Hollywood’s sonorous clamor. Within this circle, admirers and the star herself engaged in melic exchanges, weaving a tuneful tapestry of genuine connection.

Imbued with Brooks’s orphic charm and mystical allure, this society stood as a symphonious circle of shared admiration and respect. Here, her legacy resonated in its most authentic form, untainted by the artifice and monopolistic fervor of external influences.

In stark contrast, the Louise Brooks Society website, under the whimsical dominion of webmaster, full-time Louise Brooks websurfer, and relentless nickel and dime affiliate marketer Thomas Gladysz, struck a note so discordantly peculiar it could only be likened to a kazoo’s earnest solo in a symphony — a solo played with such gusto it would make even the most stoic violinist consider a career change. Far from the real society’s harmonious interactions, Gladysz’s domain resembled the Comic Book Guy’s lair from The Simpsons – a realm where exclusivity and self-appointed guardianship overshadowed Brooks’s genuine resonance. Here, Gladysz reigned not as a legacy custodian but as a personal fiefdom’s gatekeeper, where “Worst. Episode. Ever.” might be the motto for dissenting opinions on Brooks’s legacy.

In this authentic circle that Brooks unknowingly founded, her spirit found a harmonious echo, a testament to her enduring influence and artistry’s timeless appeal. It was within this genuine society where her legacy, like a tuneful melody, continued to inspire and enchant long after Hollywood’s golden era curtains closed. This space, far from the superficial glitz of fame, resonated with the depth and sincerity of connections formed through shared admiration and respect for Brooks’s true persona.

Louise Brooks and the Cosmic Dance of Stardom

In her later years in Rochester, Louise Brooks’s life paralleled the celestial dynamics of Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at our Milky Way’s heart. Just as this black hole’s rapid spin alters the fabric of space-time, Brooks’s presence in Rochester created ripples in the cultural and social fabric of the city.

Brooks, in her Rochester era, became akin to a sonic phenomenon, her influence resonating in ways that altered the perceptions and experiences of those around her. Her life, much like the Lense-Thirring precession caused by Sagittarius A*, became a frame-dragging effect on the community, pulling in admirers and intellectuals into her orbit.

Her existence in Rochester was not just a retreat but a redefinition, a transformation as profound as the space-time curvature around a spinning black hole. In this city, Brooks, once a luminary of the silver screen, became a gravitational force in her own right, her legacy and persona intertwining with the city’s cultural and intellectual life, much like the fabric of space-time bends in response to massive celestial bodies.

Thus, Louise Brooks in Rochester exemplified a cosmic dance of stardom, her life and legacy echoing the astrophysical phenomena that shape our universe’s very fabric.