Louise Brooks Online ©Created by Ctrl+Alt+LULU™ LOUISE BROOKS® & NAKED ON MY GOAT® / ©2024 Vintage Brooks, Inc. EST' B' D 2013
"Currer Bell is neither man nor woman, but an abstract thing, an artist."
• Michael Garcia Mujica, Lead Educator in Arts and Film History.
Echoing the sentiment about Charlotte Brontë's pseudonymous voice, Michael lends his expertise not only as a writer and visual artist but also as a Lead Educator in arts and film history. Based in Coral Gables, Florida, he is the principal of Vintage Brooks, Inc., where he passionately revitalizes the legacy of silent film star Louise Brooks. His acclaimed blog, Naked on My Goat, serves as a living tribute to Brooks's enduring influence in film, her profound writing, and her broad appreciation for the arts.
Just as Brontë made an indelible mark in literature despite the societal constraints of her time, Michael accentuates Brooks's trailblazing spirit within the film industry. In his role, he ensures that Brooks's iconic voice continues to resonate within the cultural lexicon of the 21st century, celebrating the intricate victories of women in arts, both past and present.
Explore more about the abstract persona of Charlotte Brontë in Michael's piece, "The Abstract Persona: Understanding Charlotte Brontë's Pseudonymous Journey as Currer Bell."
Latest posts by Michael Garcia Mujica (see all)
- The Dubious Maneuverings of Thomas Gladysz: A Blight on Louise Brooks’s Legacy - March 29, 2024
- Reclaiming Louise Brooks’ “Lulu in Hollywood” - March 12, 2024
- The Miseducation of the Louise Brooks Society - March 8, 2024
In the tenebrous domain of literature and art, identities become enmeshed with their creations, weaving an inscrutable tapestry redolent with mystique and portent. The original work metamorphoses into a canvas, imbued not with mere pigments but with the very eyes that behold it, each gaze an arcane brushstroke suffused with longing and despair. Here, variegated perspectives do not merely augment the work with layers of interpretation; they haunt it, each view a phantasmagorical reflection, ineffably shaped by the observer’s unique lens and tinged with an elegiac aftertaste. This enigmatic confluence is an observation I have sublimated in the haunting aphorism: “Currer Bell is neither man nor woman, but an abstract thing, an artist.” In the penumbral corridors of this exposition, we shall delve into the byzantine journey of Charlotte Brontë, who, in adopting the sobriquet Currer Bell, crafted a persona that permitted her oeuvre to shimmer, refulgent and unsullied, in a milieu overshadowed by constraint and preconception.
The Enigma of Currer Bell
In the serpentine topography of the 19th-century literary tableau, Brontë’s election to assume the appellation Currer Bell transcended mere ingenuity—it burgeoned as an inimitable legerdemain, an alchemy of self. This guise was no mere stratagem to ensconce herself within the preordained societal cavities; it was, instead, an audacious transmogrification, a salient metamorphosis designed not merely to defy but to apotheosize beyond the confining strictures. Within the enigmatic cloak of Currer Bell, she obfuscated and transfigured the very sinews of her identity, fashioning herself into an inscrutable wraith, an incorporeal eidolon that wafted, sovereign and detached, above the vicissitudes and doctrinaire expectations of her contemporaneous society.
Abstract Self: The Freedom in Ambiguity
The volitional metamorphosis, wherein Brontë transcended into the intangible archetype of an artist—unfettered, unlabelled, and indefinable—ushered her into an arcane echelon of creative emancipation. This was a liberation so rarefied, so ethereal, that it verged on the borders of her contemporaneous artistic imagination. In this transmogrification, she ascended beyond the mundane, accessing a poetic sublimity that resonated in ethereal whispers through the tapestry of her work.
The inscrutable enigma that enveloped Currer Bell wove a spell of profound ambiguity, imbuing the very soul of her narratives with a transcendent luminescence. Her characters, thus, were not mere figments of fiction but vital essences, unfurling in luxuriant grandeur, redolent of both the ephemeral and the eternal, mirroring life in its most primal and untainted form.
Mirroring a cryptic reflection in a shadowed, still lake—a reflection that tantalizes with abstract imagery, never quite surrendering its secrets—Brontë, as Currer Bell, became a reflective abyss for her readers. This reflection did not crystallize the unyielding geometries of reality but embraced the mercurial, the elusive. It was an impression, a fleeting sensation, an ephemeral whisper of something profound, hinting at truths beyond mere existence.
Her self, once so corporeal and concrete, gradually receded, subsumed into an obsidian shadow, indistinct and formless. In this self-effacement, she forged a pathway into the immersive universe of her novels—a realm untrammeled, pure, and resonating with a mystical beauty, unobscured by the mundane preconceptions surrounding the mere mortal behind the quill.
The Abstract Artist: A Timeless Ideology
Being an abstract artist is about transcending the physical, stepping into a realm where ideas and creativity take precedence over the physical identity of the creator. Brontë, in becoming Currer Bell, was no longer confined to the tangible world’s constraints. Instead, her ideas, her stories, and her characters were given the freedom to exist independently of their creator.
The ontology of the abstract artist is not a mere notion but an existential transcendence, a celestial voyage beyond the corporeal and into an ephemeral domain where ideas, creativity, and ethereal musings overshadow the tangible identity of the creator. This ethereal plane, abounding in its limitless scope, awaited Brontë, and in her metamorphosis into Currer Bell, she shed the cumbersome shackles of physicality, emancipating herself from the tangible world’s crude constraints.
Her ideas, those luminescent phantoms of imagination, her stories, those woven tapestries of human emotion, and her characters, those living breaths of ink and paper, were granted an autonomy, a liberation, a life unencumbered by the shadow of their creator. They thrived in a liminal space, echoing with profound truths and resonating with the very essence of humanity.
This transcendental ideology finds a symbiotic parallel in the profound teachings of “anatta” or “not-self,” a cornerstone in various Eastern philosophies. Herein lies a philosophy not of negation but of fluidity, a belief that transcends the rigid confines of “self,” embracing a constantly morphing, ever-evolving process of becoming. The self is not a monolith but a river, ceaselessly flowing, perennially changing, ever elusive.
Brontë, in her artistic embodiment as Currer Bell, did not merely represent this philosophy but lived it, breathed it, became it. She was not a static entity, frozen in time and space, but a dynamic conduit, a living catalyst for her art. She was the melody and the echo, the painter and the brush, the writer and the word—a living testament to the power of abstraction, a timeless symbol of creative freedom.
As I explored the complex identity of Currer Bell and the artistic freedoms it afforded Brontë, I found myself drawn to the mystical philosophies of the East and the ethereal nature of abstract art. This connection, bridging disparate cultures and transcending time, continues to fascinate me, speaking to something deeply human and universal.
Ephemeral Echoes: The Final Reverie on Brontë’s Celestial Dance with Identity
Charlotte Brontë’s voyage as Currer Bell was not a mere artistic whim but an existential odyssey, a journey transcending the corporeal realm and delving into the ethereal. As Currer Bell, she did not simply narrate stories but breathed life into them, transforming ink and paper into vibrant landscapes, pulsating with emotion and resonating with human truth.
Her characters, those soulful echoes of humanity, and her narratives, those intricate labyrinths of feeling and thought, stand as timeless testaments to her talent. They thrive in their autonomy, uncolored and unbound by preconceptions of their creator, flourishing in their own right, vibrant and real.
Brontë’s artistic incarnation as Currer Bell was neither a mask nor a facade, but an embodiment of creative liberation, a harmonious symphony of intellect and imagination. She became a living conduit for her art, a melody resonating in the silence, a painter weaving colors with her words, a writer sculpting the abstract into form. A living testament to the power of abstraction, she remains a timeless symbol of creative freedom, a beacon illuminating the boundless landscapes of human creativity.
In beholding the mystical dance of Currer Bell and Charlotte Brontë, I found myself entranced by the timeless resonance of abstract art, tethered to ethereal philosophies, bridging distant cultures, transcending epochs. It’s an enigmatic connection, one that speaks to the core of what it means to be human, a fascinating interplay that continues to engage, inspire, and mystify.